A conference theme

Sensitive and restricted-access species data

Protecting sensitive species locations: generalisation, restricted access, standards for withheld information, and the costs and harms of over-restriction.

11 talks & discussions
Across rooms and sessions

Explore the conversation.

talk · Tuesday 22 September · SAL B

A new standard for restricted access (sensitive) species data

A proposed Darwin Core extension would record why data were restricted and what treatment was applied, in a one-to-many way similar to MeasurementOrFact.

Tania Laity ↗
talk · Tuesday 22 September · SAL B

Restricted access species data in Finland

FinBIF applies an authority-maintained restricted species list to all mediated data, but lacks a standard way to share what it restricted and why.

Will Morris ↗
talk · Tuesday 22 September · SAL B

Restricted Access Species Data: The Swedish Model

Sweden combines a long-running role system, diffusion classes and a yes/no 'signal search' to manage 1.5 million protected records while gradually restricting fewer species.

Johan Liljeblad ↗
talk · Tuesday 22 September · SAL B

Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) for RASD: The Flemish Biodiversity Portal Approach

The Flemish portal implements restricted access through role-based access control, with institutions rather than the portal team deciding who may see high-resolution data.

Dimitri Brosens ↗
discussion · Tuesday 22 September · SAL B

SYM23 panel discussion on restricted access species data

Restricting data is costly and imperfect; panellists argued for targeted, 'shrink-wrapped', well-justified restrictions handled centrally rather than blanket redaction.

Cameron Slatyer, Dimitri Brosens, Will Morris ↗
talk · Tuesday 22 September · SAL B

The Edge: Insights into problems that arise from implementing data solutions for restricted access (sensitive) species data

Plan RASD treatments carefully, because taxonomy, data errors and associated records can silently defeat simple rules like 'generalise to 10 km'.

Cameron Slatyer ↗
talk · Tuesday 22 September · ODIN

The Swedish experience on verification and how to improve quality on observations

Human verification remains essential, and the community needs a standard to exchange verification status between systems.

Mora Aronsson ↗
talk · Tuesday 22 September · SAL A

The WildLIVE Portal: Towards Scalable Wildlife Monitoring through the Integration of Citizen Science and Human-in-the-Loop AI Workflows

WildLIVE combines a model registry, provenance-tracked human verification and FAIR publication to move camera trap data from raw images to publishable data.

Rajapreethi Rajendran ↗
talk · Tuesday 22 September · SAL B

Toward RASD Implementation in Brazil: Integrating Conservation, Open Data, and Traditional Knowledge Safeguards

Protecting traditional knowledge requires community-controlled, attribute-level and semi-restricted access, not just hiding species locations.

Clara Baringo Fonseca ↗
talk · Tuesday 22 September · SAL B

Using wildlife trade data to support proactive RASD decision-making

Wildlife trade data can act as an early warning system to protect species' locality data before formal conservation assessments catch up.

Charlotte Lassaline ↗
talk · Friday 25 September · FORUM

Integrating advanced monitoring technologies for spatially explicit, ecosystem-based biodiversity conservation across diverse habitats in Saudi Arabia

Saudi Arabia's network of 35 Biodiversity Protection Areas combines reintroductions, spatial risk mapping and satellite, camera-trap and drone monitoring to conserve species across very diverse ecosystems.

Mohammad Zafarul Islam ↗