A community-curated controlled vocabulary for fossil collections using dwc:materialEntityType
Holly Little · Rocks, Minerals, and Metadata: Integrating Earth Sciences into the TDWG Community
The short versionA granular, community-derived vocabulary for dwc:materialEntityType would let users filter fossil records by what the material actually is, which basisOfRecord cannot do.
What this was about
Holly Little explained why the new Darwin Core terms materialEntityCategory and materialEntityType (from the Darwin Core Data Package work) give paleontology collections a chance to go beyond basisOfRecord = FossilSpecimen. Using examples (insects in amber versus compression fossils, bivalves in matrix, forams as bulk samples, picks, slides or macrofossils, trilobite mass-mortality slabs) she showed that early values such as macrofossil/mesofossil/microfossil are too coarse for search, research and imaging planning. The group proposes a first-level controlled vocabulary drawn from terms collections already use, with an informal second level, and is seeking community feedback via a QR-linked document before formal proposal to Darwin Core.
Why it matters. Fossil records in aggregators like GBIF are hard to filter by the kind of physical material; a shared vocabulary improves discoverability for researchers and planning for collections staff (e.g. imaging workflows).
In the room
- basisOfRecord = FossilSpecimen only separates fossils from other record types; it cannot distinguish e.g. an insect in amber from a compression fossil.
- materialEntityCategory would carry 'fossil'/'fossilized', while materialEntityType can be more specific; early proposed values (macro-, meso-, micro-, oversized fossil) were judged not granular enough.
- Feedback was gathered from the Paleo Data Working Group, researchers, a session at the Smithsonian NMNH, the TDWG Earth Sciences and Paleobiology Interest Group and a US collections workshop.
- The vocabulary prioritises terms the paleo community already uses; some perceived overlap between terms is intentional.
- Proposal is hierarchical: a formal first level plus an informal nested second level for institutions wanting more detail.
- It covers paleontology only; geology material types are handled by a separate vocabulary Ben Norton is developing.
- Other terms (dwc:preparations, counts, taxonomy, Latimer Core terms) help but are uncontrolled, not indexed or not in Darwin Core; a morphology term does not yet exist.
Notable moments
Transcript
Automatically generated captions can contain mistakes, especially in names and technical terms. Times are relative to the room recording.


